Scientific Racism – Skulls and Brains

Neriah Clarke


This piece is the first in a series of posts about scientific racism. It may be an uncomfortable read.

Introduction

Scientific racism is the use of pseudoscience (flawed science) to perpetuate racist ideas and practices. Race itself is also a product of pseudoscience and was first documented in Carl Linnaeus’ book “systema naturae” (systems of nature), published in 1735 (Linnaeus, 1735). Much scientific focus of the 18th century was on taxonomy, so it is unsurprising that this system extended to the classification of humans. By suggesting a natural order among mankind damaging consequences ensued and such patterns are seen to this day.

Skulls

Craniometry is a branch of physical anthropology (study of humans) and focuses on the measurement of skull size. Such pseudoscience was used by Morton in the 19th century to categorise the intellect of the races (Morton, 2018 (1839)). Morton had an extensive collection of skulls from individuals of varying races and upon measuring the skulls found that the skulls of Caucasians were of greater size compared to those of Indians which were greater than those of Black people. These skull measurements were then used to suggest that cranial size reflects brain size which in turn corresponds to intellect (Morton, 2018 (1839)). Modern literature shows weak association between brain size and intelligence, but debate exists among some groups (Koch, 2016).

Brains

A commonly quoted means of measuring intelligence is that of information quotient (IQ) testing. The first IQ tests underwent development in the early 20th century (Kaufman & Harrison, 2008). A variety of IQ tests were developed such as that by Binet and Simon, Stern, Terman and Weschler but it is that by Weschler which is most commonly used today (Kaufman & Harrison, 2008). Many IQ tests are based on a comparison of individual participant scores against scores of individuals of their own age. The age specificity of IQ tests means scores cannot be generalised between age groups and scores show potential as opposed to absolute intelligence.

Another key problem is that IQ test results are culturally specific. This means that expected knowledge varies depending on environments which the participants have grown up in. Awareness of cultural specificity was not taken into account when IQ differences between “Black and White” Americans were interpreted as “Blacks” being less intelligent than “Whites” (Colman, 2016). To add, lower scores among immigrant populations e.g. Italians and Jews was used to deem such peoples “feeble-minded” (Goddard, 1917). Low IQ scores in the eugenics (good birth) era led to the forced sterilisation not only of people of colour but also that of poor individuals and of individuals with learning disabilities. It is also known that and learning difficulties such as dyslexia may affect ability to partake in such tests.

Conclusion

Craniometry is a very much dead aspect of scientific racism but IQ testing is not. Intelligence testing is still being used to this day to diagnose learning deficits in psychology, used by MENSA and anecdotal evidence suggests that some American police departments set an IQ cap for officers employed.

Skulls and brains is a tiny snippet of scientific racism, keep your eyes peeled for more!

References

Colman, A. M., 2016. Race differences in IQ: Hans Eysenck's contribution to the debate in thelight of subsequent research. Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 103, pp. 182-189.

Goddard, H. H., 1917. INTELLIGENCE OF IMMIGRANTS: Dr. H. H. Goddard Finds Indications That Large Part of Those Who Arrive in the Steerage are Feebleminded—Low Grade of Intelligence May Possibly Not Be Hereditary in This Case. Journal of Heredity, December, 8(12), p. 554–556.

Kaufman, A. & Harrison, P. L., 2008. Intelligence Testing, History of. [Online]
Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470373699.speced1103
[Accessed 15 June 2020].

Koch, C., 2016. Does Brain Size matter. Scientific American Mind, January, pp. 22-25.

Linnaeus, C., 1735. Systema Naturae. s.l.:s.n.

Morton, S., 2018 (1839). Crania Americana: or a comparatif view of the skulls of various aboriginal nations of ... America. s.l.:Creative Media Partners.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PTSD - A Psychodynamic Explanation

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a type of anxiety disorder which you may develop after being involved in, or witnessing, traumatic events. The condition was first recognised in war veterans and has been known by a variety of names, such as 'shell shock'. PTSD can develop immediately after someone experiences a disturbing event, or it can occur weeks, months or even years later. Its estimated to affect about 1 in every 3 people who have a traumatic experience, but it's not clear exactly why some people develop the condition and others do not. There are many theories that could be used to explain this condition. Psychodynamic approaches to PTSD focus on a number of different factors that may influence or cause PTSD symptoms, such as early childhood experiences, current relationships and the things people do to protect themselves from upsetting thoughts and feelings that are the result of experiencing a traumatic event. The psychodynamic approach focuses mainly
Read more

Disparities in Global Eye Care

Vision is one of our most precious possessions. Multiple polls globally show that most people are more fearful of becoming blind than losing any other sense. (1,2) With sight being such a valuable asset, one would assume that eyecare is at the forefront of medical services across the world. Living in the developed world, we perhaps take for granted the simple and yet crucial services available to us such as regular eye tests, glasses, contact lenses and high-quality ophthalmic care - most of which can be accessed for free or at a subsidised price. However, in many parts of the world this is not the case. 285 million people worldwide are visually impaired, with 90% being from developing countries. (3) In China, for example, levels of blindness are increasing each year, however critically, rates of blindness have been reported at up to 4 times higher in the developing world as compared to more economically developed countries (4, 5). This is particularly worrying given that around 80% of
Read more

Do Contact Lenses Really “Support Your Vision”?

Image
Contact lenses have been frequently used as an alternative to glasses. Compared to the heavy-framed glasses in front of one’s eyes (optic glasses), thin plastic discs on the eye (contact lenses) help correct refractive errors in both myopic and hypermetropic users. The lens’ shape and power can be tailored to the user’s sight. A concave lens can be used to decrease myopia by reducing light refraction and increasing focal length so that the image is formed on the retina (1)  (Figure 1). Alternatively, a convex lens can be used to limit hypermetropia in an opposing mechanism to concave lenses (1) (Figure 1). Figure 1, An illustration of myopia and hyperopia and how adding lens of different shapes in front of the eye can be used to alter the refraction of light and correct each impairment in vision (10) Besides supporting sight, which both types of lenses can do, contact lenses confer some advantages that make them preferable to glasses. Unlike glasses, contact lenses are less likely to f
Read more