The Fluoride Debate
Fluoride is used in toothpaste as it is able to reduce tooth
decay by strengthening tooth enamel. Fluoride binds to enamel to make it more
resistant to acid attack from bacteria. It is naturally found in water supplies
but varies in amount depending on the area. However, in the early 20th
century research led to finding that levels of tooth decay within a population
were linked with the fluoride levels in drinking water. As a result, water
fluoridation was introduced in an attempt to improve overall dental health.
Fluoridation is debated due to the worry about whether or
not fluoride is safe and whether or not it is right to mass medicate a population.
It has proved to be effective though, as research has found that children in
water fluoridation scheme areas are less likely to develop tooth decay than
those who aren’t.
Dental fluorosis is caused by ingesting too high a dose of
fluoride over a period of time whilst the teeth are still developing. It is
recognised as the appearance of white lines which can the form pits and brown
spots in severe cases. This is a rare condition as fluoride levels in water are
highly monitored to prevent situations like this from becoming an issue.
The Fluoride Action Network (http://fluoridealert.org/) leads
anti-fluoridation campaigns and has promoted a paper linking fluoride to
cancer, heart disease, infertility, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease and many
other health issues. However, the paper has been discredited due to the lack of
solid scientific evidence. Still, many communities refuse fluoridation to which
there is suggestion these populations are suffering as a result.
Overall, water fluoridation has been shown to improve
overall dental health; especially in children; but now people wonder as to
whether it is out-dated and worry about the health risks in ingesting too much.
I believe it is a good idea as child tooth decay is on the rise and so long as
the fluoride levels are monitored there are no other obvious risks. It has been
proven that fluoridation has improved tooth decay so I think it should continue
to be implemented.
Thank you for reading!
Written by Lizzie Nash
Sources
Comments
Post a Comment